ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!

Defensive publication and prior art databases

Red alert.png What this entry documents is not a solution.
This practice may be ineffective or useless in the long term.
ESP's position is that abolition of software patents is the only solution.


One way to invalidate a patent is to find prior art - an example of the idea that pre-dates the patent. Publishing prior art is a common business strategy. The most known publication to this effect is the IBM Disclosure Bulletin[1], but other companies like ASEA[2][3] has used it extensively. By publishing ideas, you block others from patenting what is (now) already known.

Whether it is better or worse for Free Software to make it easy to find prior art is a subject of much discussion, as is the question whether published source code may be regarded as prior art[4].

Limits to effectiveness

  1. Sometimes there is no prior art.
  2. Sometimes the prior art only eliminates part of the patent. The patent holder will be permitted to redraft their patent to keep the non duplicated parts while avoiding the prior art you've found.
  3. This can backfire if the database is public because patent applicants could use the database to see what changes are necessary (the smallest changes possible) to avoid being similar to the prior art, so they won't have to worry about their patent being invalidated.

Defensive publication

Defensive publication is the idea that by documenting and publishing an idea, you can prevent the future problem that someone else will patent that idea.

For example, in 2004, a paper was published on "Precise detection of memory leaks".[5] In 2007, a patent application was filed at the USPTO for a follow-on invention.[6] The 2007 application cited the 2004 paper as being part of the state-of-the-art which is extended by the patent application. The authors of the 2004 paper have no connection to the authors of the 2007 patent application. Ironically, one of the authors of the 2004 paper is a prominent member of the anti-software patent group FFII.

Related pages on ESP Wiki

External links

About the Drawbacks

References

{

Non-solutions
Law Antitrust law · Free software exception · Interoperability exception · Loser-Pays rule · Patent review by the public · Raising examination standards · Independent invention defense · Reducing patent duration
Litigation Invalidating harmful patents · Suing makers of unfounded accusations
Licenses Patent clauses in software licenses
Prior art Defensive publication and prior art databases
Company practice Buying harmful patents · Changing company patent policies · Defensive patent acquisition · Insurance against patent litigation · Non-aggression promise to employees · Patent non-aggression pacts · Blanket patent licences and promises