Talk:Red Hat

SOAP controversy

I've moved this comment from the article to here:

This section appears to be either misleading or inaccurate in several regards. I have asked folks to review this page. -- Warren Togami 20100207

It was on the article from February 7th 2010 to April 21st 2010, but the contributor hasn't come back. Ciaran 16:38, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

There was a notice in that section (a big red box) pointing to this comment, from April 2010 to November 2011, but no one made any further comment about how the section might be inaccurate. Ciaran 20:38, 9 November 2011 (EST)

TechRights stories

TechRights has the following stories about Red Hat and patents:

• http://techrights.org/2009/03/17/red-hat-patent-fire/
• http://techrights.org/2009/03/21/novl-rht-software-patents/
• http://techrights.org/2009/03/18/amqp-patents-red-hat/
• http://techrights.org/2009/03/25/how-red-hat-dodged-a-novell-like-deal-despite-lobbying-for-software-patents/
• http://techrights.org/2009/03/29/red-hat-microsoft-eu-lobbyists/
• http://techrights.org/2009/03/22/red-hat-again-epo-and-uspto/
• http://techrights.org/2009/03/31/patents-roundup-red-hat-et-al/

I haven't had time to search these for first-hand info, and I don't think I'll find time in the near future (busy with Bilski), but wanted to include them for future reference. Ciaran 16:19, 30 May 2010 (UTC)