Independent invention defence
What this entry documents is not a solution.
This practice may be ineffective or useless in the long term.
ESP's position is that abolition of software patents is the only solution.
One proposal to reduce the harm of software patents is an independent invention defence.
Note: this is only proposed in hypothetical discussions. There are no known proposals or laws that actually implement this idea.
(NEEDS CHECKING) The general idea would be that if a developer does not copy the work of a patent holder (or licensee?) then any infringement would be coincidental, or "independent", and would be permitted.
Regarding standards
This would solve some problems of access to standards, but not all.
Example #1: If a company patents an idea and builds a standard around it, you would have to look at their work if you want to be compatible, so your software would not be "independent". This defence wouldn't help you.
Example #2: If a Company-A builds a standard, and you look at that Company-A's work and write something compatible, and you then get threatened by Company-B, you (and Company-A) could use the independent invention defence.
Related pages on ESP Wiki
- Competition law defence
- Interoperability exceptions
- Prof Michael Meurer supports this idea, IIRC
External links
- We need an independent invention defense to minimize the damage of aggressive patent trolls, by venture capitalist Brad Burnham
- Discussing this article: Well Respected VC Firm Comes Out In Favor Of Independent Invention Defense Against Patent Infringement Lawsuits, techdirt.com
- Why We Need An Independent Invention Defense, by venture capitalist Fred Wilson
